A teacher mentioned that in pre-modern times knowledge was seen primarily as a public good. This can be seen by how scholars would borrow and cut-and-paste, often without attribution, views and knowledge from other scholars and incorporate that into their own works. This can also be seen through how sciences and arts were funded by public funds in order to serve the public good.
Today, copyright laws and patent laws indicate that knowledge and ingenuity indicate that profit-motives are primary motives.
How does that affect how we think of knowledge, how new-ideas are used vis-a-vis society and the public good?
Is it a losing proposition to rethink these structures?
If so, is it still good to reintroduce the former view, of the pre-moderns, as an ideal that we ought to keep in mind and develop in our own sub-cultures and communities?
T